Case Library
Active and historical artifact verification cases under VERITAS AI review. Click any case to see the full authentication breakdown.
Case Information
Enter case details before beginning artifact verification.
0 of 0 items verified
Types of Artifacts Admitted as Evidence
Courts accept many forms of digital evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence (Rules 901, 902, 1001–1008). Each type carries unique AI-generation risks.
Log an Artifact for This Case
AI Detection Verification Checklist
Systematically evaluate each artifact against these verification criteria.
AI Generation Probability Rating
Based on your checklist and analysis, the system calculates a composite AI-generation risk score.
Rating Scale
Rate Individual Artifacts
Add artifacts in the "Artifact Types" tab first.
Landmark Cases & Precedents
Key judicial decisions addressing AI-generated evidence and digital artifact authentication.
Key Legal Standards for AI Evidence
Federal Rules of Evidence
Rule 901(a): Requires that evidence be authenticated — the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what they claim.
Rule 901(b)(9): Allows authentication through evidence describing a process or system and showing it produces an accurate result.
Rule 702 (Daubert): Expert testimony on AI detection must be based on sufficient facts, reliable principles, and reliable application.
Emerging Standards
C2PA / Content Credentials: Cryptographic provenance metadata embedded in media files at creation.
NIST AI 100-4: Framework for reducing risks of synthetic content, including detection benchmarks.
ABA Resolution 604 (2024): Urging courts to develop protocols for AI-generated evidence.
End-to-End Verification Workflow
Follow this step-by-step process for each artifact submitted as evidence.